Archive for August, 2006



18
Aug

Tutorial: DVD Movie Backups with DVDShrink (3 of 6)

Summary: DVD Shrink is a software program used to make backups of DVD movies. Using DVD Shrink, you can read data from one DVD then write it to a blank DVD or to your hard drive. The copied disc can be played in standalone DVD players or computers that contain a DVD-ROM with the appropriate DVD player software. Part 3 steps through the installation and configuration of the software packages used in later sections of the tutorial.

Note: This tutorial may not be used to illegally reproduce copyrighted materials. American readers should review the Digital Millennium Copyright Act before attempting to circumvent any form of copy protection.


Software Installation

Important Note: Adhering to the copyright laws of several major nations, this tutorial will not link directly to files or web pages for the following software packages

Important Note: Adhering to the copyright laws of several major nations, this tutorial will not link directly to files or web pages for the following software packages

  • DVD Shrink
  • DVD Decrypter

Please use the Google search box below to find these software packages.




Google



Installing DVD Shrink

    SetupShrink01.jpg
  1. UnZIP the downloaded ZIP file. Click on the DVD Shrink executable file to start the installation process
  2. SetupShrink02.jpg

  3. Click on the Next button when the welcome screen appears.
  4. SetupShrink03.jpg

  5. Read the end-user license agreement and click on the radio button captioned “I accept the agreement”. Click on the Next button to continue.
  6. SetupShrink04.jpg

  7. Click on the Next button if to install DVD Shrink in the default directory (usually “C:Program Files DVD Shrink”). Alternatively, click on the Browse button to select a different directory (then click on the Next button to continue).
  8. SetupShrink05.jpg

  9. Click on the Next button to create a shortcut in the default folder. Alternatively, click on the Browse button to select a different folder (then click on the Install button once the new directory is selected).
  10. SetupShrink06.jpg

  11. Click on the check boxes to activate or deactivate desktop / quick launch icons. Click on the Next button.
  12. SetupShrink07.jpg

  13. Review the installation settings and click on the Install button to begin copying files.
  14. SetupShrink08.jpg

  15. Click on the Finish button to complete the installation process.

Continue reading ‘Tutorial: DVD Movie Backups with DVDShrink (3 of 6)’

17
Aug

Tutorial: DVD Movie Backups with DVDShrink (2 of 6)

Summary: DVD Shrink is a software program used to make backups of DVD movies. Using DVD Shrink, you can read data from one DVD then write it to a blank DVD or to your hard drive. The copied disc can be played in standalone DVD players or computers that contain a DVD-ROM with the appropriate DVD player software. Part 2 discusses first considerations when deciding if and how to backup a DVD.

Note: This tutorial may not be used to illegally reproduce copyrighted materials. American readers should review the Digital Millennium Copyright Act before attempting to circumvent any form of copy protection.


First Considerations

Before attempting to backup a DVD movie, there are several factors to consider -

Is this Legal?

Before even attempting to backup a DVD, consider whether doing so is legal. Copyright laws vary from country to country: Americans must refer to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) while European moviegoers should look at the EU Copyright Directive. In practice, consumers can to backup movies they own without much fear of prosecution, but absolutely should not give backups of movies to others or make backups of rented/borrowed discs. In other words, backing up your Battle Star Galactica DVD set for safety’s sake is ok, while duplicating the Mandingo DVD rentals are not!

Is a Separate Program Required for Ripping?

DVD Shrink is able to decrypt and read unprotected discs and standard CSS-protected discs. However, the program is unable to decrypt discs with some of the newer protection schemes like Sony’s Arccos. The solution is to use an external DVD ripper that can decrypt the special protection, mount the resulting disc image on a virtual DVD drive, then run DVD Shrink on the mounted disc image. The cost of this process (apart from extra time) is that up to an additional 9.4GB of space will be required to store the disc image. The disc image method is fully described in the section titled “In Action: DVD Backup using Disc Images”.

What blank DVD Media Should be Used?

Several factors must be considered when selecting a blank DVD for movie backups:

DVD+R vs. DVD-R

DVD-R was the first recordable disc format (maintained by the DVDForum), originally created for professional use and later enginneered for consumer use. DVD+R was released later and is maintained by the DVD+RW Alliance. Both formats are equally good for backing up movies and typically cost the same to purchase.

Earlier generations of DVD burners could only write DVD-R or DVD+R discs, while most recent DVD burners can write to both formats. Check your recorder specs to determine which formats are supported.

Recordable (R) vs Rewritable (RW)

DVD-R and DVD+R discs can only be written to once; however both formats have rewritable versions – DVD-RW and DVD+RW. Rewritable discs allow users to “erase” burned discs and burn new data afterward. Generally speaking, rewritable discs are more expensive than recordable discs and burn at slower speeds. One might use a RW disc to create a “test burn” before committing a final project to recordable disc.

Single Layer vs. Dual Layer (DL)

Until recently, the standard DVD-R/W and DVD+R/W capacity was 4.7GB – roughly half the capacity of some store-bought DVD titles and generally less than most titles for sale. The release of dual layer discs (named in contrast to previous blank DVD media that stored its data on a single disc layer) nearly doubles recordable capacity to 8.5GB. Most titles will need minimal or no compression when backing up to DL blank discs. Conversely, backing of a title that’s not much larger than 4.7GB to dual layer discs would be a waste of space (and money – DL discs are still relatively new and considerably more expensive than regular blank DVDs).

Disc Brand

When using a new disc brand, try the first burned disc on a few different players to check whether the movie skips or pauses. Be sure to verify that the last 20 minutes of the movie play properly – some cheaper DVD players have problems reading the outer region of burned DVDs.

Full Disc vs Movie-Only

By default, DVD Shrink backs up all movie-related components of the DVD: the main movie, menus and extras. However, backing up larger amounts of data requires greater compression and the resulting backup will have low video quality. Additionally, the user may be interested in just the movie and not wish to navigate menus or sit through mandatory commercials (the latter being an increasing problem on DVDs from a select number of film companies that shall remain nameless). To address these issues, DVD Shrink has a special mode called “Re-Author”, which allows users to drag and drop video titles onto a template. DVD Shrink will create a backup consisting only of those video titles selected.

Note: Re-Author mode destroys all menus and as a result may not be appropriate for episodic discs (eg Simpsons episode DVDs).


Series Index:
Part 1 – Introduction
Part 2 – First Considerations
Part 3 – Software Installation
Part 4 – Performing a Regular DVD Backup
Part 5 – Performing a DVD Backup from a Disc Image
Part 5 – Part 6 – What’s Next

16
Aug

Tutorial: DVD Movie Backups with DVDShrink (1 of 6)

Summary: DVD Shrink is a software program used to make backups of DVD movies. Using DVD Shrink, you can read data from one DVD then write it to a blank DVD or to your hard drive. The copied disc can be played in standalone DVD players or computers that contain a DVD-ROM with the appropriate DVD player software. Part 1 introduces DVD Shrink and briefly discusses its capabilities

Note: This tutorial may not be used to illegally reproduce copyrighted materials. American readers should review the Digital Millennium Copyright Act before attempting to circumvent any form of copy protection.


Introduction

What is DVD Shrink?

DVD Shrink is a software program used to make backups of DVD movies. Using DVD Shrink, you can read data from one DVD then write it to a blank DVD or to your hard drive. The copied disc can be played in standalone DVD players or computers that contain a DVD-ROM with the appropriate DVD player software (Windows Media Player is adequate for this task).

What can DVD Shrink do?

Backup Movie and Episode Discs

DVD Shrink allows users to backup a DVD movie to another disc or to a disc image (generally referred to as an ISO) that can be mounted or written to disc later. Users can also save DVD files to a hard disk directory for later use with DVD-authoring software (e.g. Nero).

Backup an Entire Disc or Just the Movie

Users can decide whether to back up an entire disc (including titles, menus and extras) or just the movie portion of a DVD.

Remove Copy Protection

DVD Shrink removes built-in encryption (CSS) on commercial discs that prevent consumers from directly duplicating a DVD disc. Without removing this encryption, copied discs will not work and attempting to copy a disc under these conditions may damage computer hardware. Please see the section “Is the Legal?” before attempting to circumvent any copy protection scheme.

Reduce Movie Size to Fit on Blank DVD R Media

Most importantly, DVD Shrink can reduce the size of a commercial DVD (which can be up to 9.4GB in size) to 4.7GB (standard size for most DVD-R or DVD+R blank media) or less. This feat is accomplished through a process called compressed domain transcoding, which essentially changes the properties of a the DVD video stream without changing the video format or having to completely reconstruct the stream. In the case of “shrinking” a DVD, the video bit rate is reduced, which allows the video stream to take up less space. The obvious trade off for this bit rate reduction is that the video quality will suffer. Reduction in video quality can be affected by the original video stream size, video complexity (i.e. high action scenes vs low action scenes) and selectable options within DVD Shrink.

What Can’t DVD Shrink do?

Convert DVD Movies to AVI/MPEG2/DivX/etc

If you want to “rip” your movies into one of the popular computer formats (DivX, MPEG2, Quicktime…), try one of the following programs:

AutoGK
Gordian Knot
DVDx
DivX 6 Professional

Convert AVI/MPEG2/DivX/etc to a DVD-Ready Format

Many people would like to be able to view their computer files on a regular television. While the best bet is almost certainly to buy a DVD player that plays computer files from a CD-ROM or DVD-ROM, there exist software packages that convert these files to the DVD structure. None of these applications have proven to be the “silver bullet” for creating the perfect DVD from computer files, but the software titles at the top of the list do an acceptable job:

DVD2SVCD
AVI2DVD
DVD Santa


Series Index:
Part 1 – Introduction
Part 2 – First Considerations
Part 3 – Software Installation
Part 4 – Performing a Regular DVD Backup
Part 5 – Performing a DVD Backup from a Disc Image
Part 5 – Part 6 – What’s Next

12
Aug

Blu-Ray … HD-DVD …

BBC News Reports on the war between next generation DVD formats -

The battle between two rival and incompatible high-definition DVD formats will end in stalemate, a research firm has predicted.

Blu-ray and HD-DVD are the two new formats being rolled out globally over the course of the next 12 months.

But Screen Digest predicts neither format will gain the upper hand and that the rivalry will do damage to the market for high-def DVDs overall.

Sony is the principal supporter of Blu-ray while Toshiba backs HD-DVD.

A few thoughts on this format war:

  • History has shown that Sony is a bad bet whenever there is an alternative format. The VHS/Betamax war is the most famous format war in recent history, and Sony’s Betamax lost badly despite being having slightly better picture quality. Less famous is Sony’s minidisc - a cassette tape replacement that coincided with the rise of blank CD-R’s and thus failed to gain significant marketshare (except perhaps in the niche market of budget audio mastering). Sony’s memory stick proved to be a far more expensive alternative to other flash media with no significant benefits. Conversely, Sony tends to be a winner whenever it uses accepted media formats – the DVD-based Playstation 2 and the company’s line of DV Camcorders being the best examples. Based on this history I’d back HD-DVD
  • Microsoft’s backing for HD-DVD may be the deciding factor because the initial aim for both formats is to get as many players in homes as possible. Microsoft’s upcoming Vista Operating System will almost certainly force a hardware upgrade, meaning millions of potential HD-DVD machines coud be purchased in the next 3-4 years. The Blu Ray camp is unable to force a similar universal upgrade among owners of DVD Players
  • Dual-format players will be the preferred hardware choice among speculators
  • Like most people, I’ll be sticking with the current DVD format until (1) I have a high-resolution TV, most people’s TV’s can’t even display DVD titles at full quality (2) I’m fairly certain about not being left with a “betamax machine”
07
Aug

Reuters Drops the Ball

Merely days after CU expressed reservations about the accuracy media coverage in the Middle East, a new controversy has erupted:

Reuters, the global news and information agency, told a freelance Lebanese photographer on Sunday it would not use any more of his pictures after he doctored an image of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on Beirut.
The photograph by Adnan Hajj, which was published on news websites on Saturday, showed thick black smoke rising above buildings in the Lebanese capital after an Israeli air raid in the war with the Shiite Islamic group Hezbollah, now in its fourth week.
“The photographer has denied deliberately attempting to manipulate the image, saying that he was trying to remove dust marks and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under,” said Moira Whittle, the head of public relations for Reuters.

Granted Ms Whittle has a job to do, but she really needs to learn the difference between removing dust marks and cloning. The former involves the removal of “specks” on a digital photographs, and cannot possibly result in the disparity of colors shown below. By contrast, cloning involves copying a portion of a photograph to another part of the photograph. When done well the picture looks seamless and unaltered. Poor cloning results in an apparent texture pattern, which is clearly visible in the smoke patterns of this photo.

beirut-original.jpg

A possible original photograph (Source: LGF)

beirut-pshopped.jpg

Beirut Photograph, as Published by Reuters

Reuters has lost any media source’s most important asset – credibility. Already, pundits are questioning the validity of Reuters’ Qana photographs and no doubt other photographs from Hajj are under scrutiny.

The original charge of photo manipulation was made by Charles Johnson of the popular Pro-Israeli blog Little Green Footballs. For his effort, Johnson was threatened via email and the email was IP traced to none other than Reuters. Current speculation is that Inayat Bunglawala, Media Secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain, may have been involved in creating the threat. Meanwhile, more charges of doctored and staged photos are being levied by the hour.

The discovery of the doctored photos and forced admission of error by Reuters represents a huge victory for the blogosphere; by forcing a large media conglomerate to admit error and correct its ways, the independent online media has established itself as a semi-reliable check and balance on news disseminated by the mainstream media.

The loser in this skirmish is obvious. Hajj is clearly the instigator of the controversy, but clearly the blame belongs with the editing staff at Reuters. With a topic as divisive and high-stakes as the conflict in the Middle East, the news agency should be going over every piece of information it receives with a fine-toothed comb. Reuters could easily argue that LGF and other blogs attacking this story are partisan and no more interested in accuracy than Hajj, and they might be right; however, Reuters is supposed to differentiate itself from blogs (for which there is no minimum bar of journalistic integrity) with original, accurate and verified content. By not adhering to such standards, Reuters gives the public no reason to trust their reports any more than those of any idealist with a Blogspot account.

Also, Reuters, fire your PR department. That was a terrible excuse.

06
Aug

Caribana 2006 Jump Up Pt 2

Click on Pictures to Enlarge
As promised here are some more shots from Caribana 2006

100_3949.jpg

I didn’t attend the Irie Festival so there isn’t much else to say about the Caribana happenings. Looking at some other blogs, Americans were impressed with Toronto’s cleanliness and friendliness. People also seemed to be happy with the organization of the event, which is no surprise since it is being run by the same association that ran Caribana during its only profitable year to date.

100_3958.jpg

Of course there were the usual trolls who used Caribana to vent their grievances with black people. I’ll spare you the lecture about tolerance and point out that Trinidad, the mother nation of the carnival, is nearly half South Asian. Moreover the steel pan bands are made up of many groups including local Caucasians, while people jumping up appeared to range from 16 to their late 60’s and appeared to cover every major ethnic group in Toronto (at one point I saw a Muslim lady covered head to toe pushing a stroller alongside a float).

100_3927.jpg

Continue reading ‘Caribana 2006 Jump Up Pt 2′

05
Aug

Caribana 2006 – Jump Up!

Click on Pictures to Enlarge

Toronto Caribbean Carnival? No, everyone -from the carnival emcees to the media- still calls it Caribana. The main parade for North America’s largest Caribbean festival took place at Exhibition Place today and it was one hell of a party.

100_3901.jpg

The weather could not have been more agreeable – sunny, not terribly humid (thanks to thunderstorms a few days prior) and a cool Lake Ontario breeze that flowed over heated revelers. That said, heat exhaustion and heat stroke were a very real risk (at one point my group scrambled to find a bottle of water for an elderly reveler who was on the verge of fainting) and so liquids were in great supply. For the most part the water was free, handed out by the bands … but of course there were enterprising minds who were willing to sell much colder water for a dollar.

100_3886.jpg

Spectators had the choice of paying $15 to get into the preferred grounds (lined along the interior of the parade route, next to the major CNE buildings) or could otherwise jockey with the masses on the strip of land next to the harbor for a view of the action. A few clever individuals from the “free” side breached the security fence and got right into the parade action, dancing with the band participants and getting some choice photo/video.
Continue reading ‘Caribana 2006 – Jump Up!’

04
Aug

More Information, More Sources, Less Clarity

“Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see.”
-Benjamin Franklin

Jack of Jack’s Newswatch takes a moment to ponder the media’s objectivity concerning the recent Israeli attack on Qana:

Lately I’ve been trying to focus on the situation in Israel and the misleading press reports that are being constantly pumped out by CNN, Reuters, AP and many others. I truly wonder whose side they’re on and I would “just betcha” that if the homes or families of any of these “honest” reporters were threatened in the manner that Israeli citizens are now being threatened we’d soon get an entirely different picture of the situation.

I should point out now that that I have reasonable cause to believe (and do believe) that news outlets deliberately fail to tell the motoring public all that is known about a news event for reasons which are highly suspect (and completely unexplainable). A good “for instance” is the important information developed by very hardworking bloggers on the situation in Qana. I’ve been following it for days because I am also aware of the situation in the Palestinian territories wherein a criminal organization made up an entirely false story and claimed a massacre that never happened.

The label “objective” can be very difficult to ponder, much less award to a single news source. On one hand I have tremendous respect for the BBC and CNN as international news organizations that have done much to keep remote areas of the world informed on current events. Their attempts to be balanced and objective will always be criticized by partisan groups like Honest Reporting because such groups are more interested in spreading their political causes than honestly evaluating “facts”.

On the other hand, BBC and other news networks have been caught in some very embarassing SNAFU moments, such as the “massacre” in Jenin that turned out to be completely overstated. Also, I remember watching commentary from Eric Margolis and CBC reporters as the US first attacked Iraq post-9/11. Margolis stated it was likely that 10000 Iraqis were killed after the first bombings, while a CBC reporter implored the viewers to remember that Iraqi citizens personally did nothing to George W Bush or America. “What does that have to do with the story?” I thought to myself. Moreover, how did Margolis come up with the estimates (which were grossly overstated)? Quite often, MSM organizations both show organizational bias and try to be the first organization to get the dramatic story. The result is a body of news controlled by elitist conglomerates that can be far from objective.

Alternatively, the blogosphere offers an unprecedented opporunity for readers to get information direct from individuals involved in conflict. Blogs like Live From an Israeli Bunker allow viewers to get a first-hand, uncensored account of events that occur in hotspots like Israel. Political aggregators and blog commentators can summarize and editorialize this information, creating a parallel news media that has equal or greater value to many readers than do the CNN’s and BBC’s of the world. However, independent media has always been a wild west in that there are no rules for what can be posted or standards on fact checking. Earlier this year, the New York Times got in hot water for publishing classified information and still risk legal action as a result (not to mention scorn from the military that was imperiled as a result of the information leak). As bloggers and other independent media -whom now play on a level cyberspace field with the big media outlets- struggle to differentiate themselves in the sea of recycled factoids, we could see a lot more “exclusives” that have been stolen, prematurely-declassified or simply made up.

Only the underlying danger remains constant – consumers prefer to read what they’d like to hear. As such, “due dilligence” tends to be exercised only when one doesn’t like the tone of the message. For this reason, it would be a mistake for readers to become comfortable with any one news source or family of news sources. The increased selection and channels for news has, ironically, made objective analysis more difficult.

02
Aug

The Disproportionate Palestinian Response to Condi

The political left and those genuinely opposed to the oppression of indigenous peoples by so-called “civilized” nations were quick to adopt Palestinians as a client group. After all, who wouldn’t be moved by images of large Israeli tanks rolling menacingly towards little Palestinian children?

It’s a romantic story on paper, but it belies the hatred in the hearts of many Palestinians – hatred that is not all directed towards Israel. The Jerusalem post reports on the visceral Arab reaction to recent visits by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice

Calling on Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah to bomb Tel Aviv, many protesters also chanted slogans against Rice and the US. “O Condaleezza, you are a condara [shoe],” shouted a group of Fatah activists. An elderly woman yelled: “Shame on you, Condaleezza, your parents were slaves for the whites!”

Playing the fellow victim card is questionable, but at least one can always count on the Palestinians to blatantly spell out their position:

“The Palestinians hate her because of her arrogance and because of the policy she represents,” said a veteran Palestinian newspaper editor. “Moreover, many Palestinians are angry with her because they think that all black people should be on their side.”

And you thought the Democrat Party took black support for granted. People simply refuse to recognize is that assuming someone will take a specific political position just because of his/her ethnic background is just as prejudicial as any ethnic slur. Political philosophies are more so defined by upbringing, economic beginnings, indoctrination and of course personal convictions. Having worked with George H.W. Bush, former California Governor Pete Wilson and former secretary of state James Baker among others, it should be no major surprise that the right-leaning Rice would tend to favor the pro-western state of Israel over its anti-Western Islamacist foes.

Speaking of ethnic slurs, the Palestinian media’s portrayal of Condi would make Don Raye proud. Observe these two cartoons mocking Dr Rice’s public hope for the birth of a new middle east:


condi2.jpg
Editorial Cartoon: Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda (via Palestinian Media Watch)

condi1.jpg
Editorial Cartoon: Al-Quds

Keep these cartoons and quotes in mind the next time you see Pro-Palestinian protesters chanting “Zionism is Racism”.

Update: Booker Rising linked to this post and a lively discussion is taking place. I strongly encourage you to look at the discussion (and the site in general). Special thanks to Shay for the link.




Further Research

Twitter

Archives

Categories