<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breastfeeding in the Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/</link>
	<description>Dissecting What You Choose to Ignore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilia Liz</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>To MDMHM,

Well, I suppose breast milk has myriad uses...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To MDMHM,</p>
<p>Well, I suppose breast milk has myriad uses&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loan</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>loan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-697</guid>
		<description>All people deserve good life time and &lt;a href=&quot;http://lowest-rate-loans.com/topics/credit-loans&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;credit loans&lt;/a&gt; or just credit loan can make it much better. Just because people&#039;s freedom is based on money state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All people deserve good life time and <a href="http://lowest-rate-loans.com/topics/credit-loans" rel="nofollow">credit loans</a> or just credit loan can make it much better. Just because people&#8217;s freedom is based on money state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDMHM</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>MDMHM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-696</guid>
		<description>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/christian_adult_nursing_relationships/

Here is the link, didn&#039;t come thru with the above post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/christian_adult_nursing_relationships/" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/christian_adult_nursing_relationships/</a></p>
<p>Here is the link, didn&#8217;t come thru with the above post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDMHM</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>MDMHM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Christian Yahoo Group dedicated to this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian Yahoo Group dedicated to this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilia Liz</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-694</guid>
		<description>That is interesting.  I think my husband simply doesn&#039;t want to get milk on his hands; he wasn&#039;t exactly thrilled when I leaked milk during the act itself!

I think humans&#039; views toward sex and breastfeeding are complicated.  In some cultures there are taboos on sexual intercourse right after childbirth because it is believed that semen will poison the milk.  Some women in addition might no longer view their breasts as sexual organs when they are breastfeeding because lactation can cause women&#039;s breasts to engorge and be too uncomfortable to get much pleasures out of.  But it really depends on the woman, her culture, and so on.

Here is a little tip: if your breasts feel painfully engorged, sometimes a little squeeze of the nipples (done by the woman herself or her husband) can alleviate the pain by expressing even a small amount of milk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is interesting.  I think my husband simply doesn&#8217;t want to get milk on his hands; he wasn&#8217;t exactly thrilled when I leaked milk during the act itself!</p>
<p>I think humans&#8217; views toward sex and breastfeeding are complicated.  In some cultures there are taboos on sexual intercourse right after childbirth because it is believed that semen will poison the milk.  Some women in addition might no longer view their breasts as sexual organs when they are breastfeeding because lactation can cause women&#8217;s breasts to engorge and be too uncomfortable to get much pleasures out of.  But it really depends on the woman, her culture, and so on.</p>
<p>Here is a little tip: if your breasts feel painfully engorged, sometimes a little squeeze of the nipples (done by the woman herself or her husband) can alleviate the pain by expressing even a small amount of milk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-693</guid>
		<description>I must say how much I appreciate your story, very well put.
As to husbands, I guess they are all different. Mine calls my milk, &quot;liquid love&quot; and &quot;Mother&#039;s medecine&quot;. He says 2 breasts for 1 baby doesn&#039;t add up and he delights in making sure none is wasted.
At first for me it was difficult to reconcile feeding and sex but I could see how much he enjoyed it and after I relaxed about it, we both are much happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say how much I appreciate your story, very well put.<br />
As to husbands, I guess they are all different. Mine calls my milk, &#8220;liquid love&#8221; and &#8220;Mother&#8217;s medecine&#8221;. He says 2 breasts for 1 baby doesn&#8217;t add up and he delights in making sure none is wasted.<br />
At first for me it was difficult to reconcile feeding and sex but I could see how much he enjoyed it and after I relaxed about it, we both are much happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilia Liz</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>To Kate,

Thank you again for your comment.

I suppose I&#039;ll have to take an &quot;agnostic&quot; approach to the question of whether the reference to the woman&#039;s breast satisfying her husband was in relation to breast milk.

I will say however that some Western men may take a &quot;hands-off&quot; position on a woman&#039;s breast when she is nursing a baby.  Case in point: my husband (he actually is from Nicaragua, which I do consider a Western country).  He hasn&#039;t touched my breasts since I gave birth, though in reality even before he wasn&#039;t fixated on breasts as some men are.  It may be because he doesn&#039;t want to get milk on his hands.  Occasionally a woman will leak breast milk while she is having sex (know this first-hand), and some men don&#039;t like that.

This is kind of going a bit off-topic, but the ironic thing is that the human female breast is different from that of other female mammals in that we are the only species in which the breast enlarges even when we are not lactating.  In fact, male chimpanzees (our closest relative in the animal kingdom) are not excited by large breasts on a female chimp because it means she is nursing an infant and thus is not fertile at the moment.  So I think human females are the only species where the breast is sexual rather than just available for nutrition.

There is a good book called Woman: An Intimate Geography by New York Times science writer Natalie Angier, and it has a chapter on breasts and another on breast milk.  You might want to buy it or check it out at the library because it is quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Kate,</p>
<p>Thank you again for your comment.</p>
<p>I suppose I&#8217;ll have to take an &#8220;agnostic&#8221; approach to the question of whether the reference to the woman&#8217;s breast satisfying her husband was in relation to breast milk.</p>
<p>I will say however that some Western men may take a &#8220;hands-off&#8221; position on a woman&#8217;s breast when she is nursing a baby.  Case in point: my husband (he actually is from Nicaragua, which I do consider a Western country).  He hasn&#8217;t touched my breasts since I gave birth, though in reality even before he wasn&#8217;t fixated on breasts as some men are.  It may be because he doesn&#8217;t want to get milk on his hands.  Occasionally a woman will leak breast milk while she is having sex (know this first-hand), and some men don&#8217;t like that.</p>
<p>This is kind of going a bit off-topic, but the ironic thing is that the human female breast is different from that of other female mammals in that we are the only species in which the breast enlarges even when we are not lactating.  In fact, male chimpanzees (our closest relative in the animal kingdom) are not excited by large breasts on a female chimp because it means she is nursing an infant and thus is not fertile at the moment.  So I think human females are the only species where the breast is sexual rather than just available for nutrition.</p>
<p>There is a good book called Woman: An Intimate Geography by New York Times science writer Natalie Angier, and it has a chapter on breasts and another on breast milk.  You might want to buy it or check it out at the library because it is quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I think the idea is sexual satisfaction but not the way it&#039;s been rewritten in new translations.
We westerners love to categorize things and put things in boxes. My breasts are for my husband until baby comes along but now they are for baby!
The bible was written by and for middle easterners who have a more holistic view of life. Add to that, women were raised to think their role in life was to support their husbands and raise as many children as possible. (go forth and multiply)Breastfeeding was mandatory for 2 years and normal for up to 5 (Talmud)
That means that the average wife was breastfeeding non stop for the first 20 years or more of her marriage.
Under those conditions it would be difficult for a husband to not get a mouthful of milk when making love. I imagine there would be differences in personality reactions ranging from Oops! to Mmm what a nice bonus! to Mmm can I have the other side now!
The Song of Solomon has 2 images of breasts as fruit (something you eat) one is a pomegranate, I think it is a visual cue, being round and with a nipple like protrusion on the top. The other is a bunch of grapes! If a woman&#039;s breasts looked like a bunch of grapes I think she would be visiting the Dr regularly. The primary product of grapes is juice!
I think that the passage indicates that a man should be sexually satisfied by his wifes breasts and that that includes drinking her milk, not excludes it. We westerners have difficulty with blurring the lines but middle easterners don&#039;t. Just my huble opinion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea is sexual satisfaction but not the way it&#8217;s been rewritten in new translations.<br />
We westerners love to categorize things and put things in boxes. My breasts are for my husband until baby comes along but now they are for baby!<br />
The bible was written by and for middle easterners who have a more holistic view of life. Add to that, women were raised to think their role in life was to support their husbands and raise as many children as possible. (go forth and multiply)Breastfeeding was mandatory for 2 years and normal for up to 5 (Talmud)<br />
That means that the average wife was breastfeeding non stop for the first 20 years or more of her marriage.<br />
Under those conditions it would be difficult for a husband to not get a mouthful of milk when making love. I imagine there would be differences in personality reactions ranging from Oops! to Mmm what a nice bonus! to Mmm can I have the other side now!<br />
The Song of Solomon has 2 images of breasts as fruit (something you eat) one is a pomegranate, I think it is a visual cue, being round and with a nipple like protrusion on the top. The other is a bunch of grapes! If a woman&#8217;s breasts looked like a bunch of grapes I think she would be visiting the Dr regularly. The primary product of grapes is juice!<br />
I think that the passage indicates that a man should be sexually satisfied by his wifes breasts and that that includes drinking her milk, not excludes it. We westerners have difficulty with blurring the lines but middle easterners don&#8217;t. Just my huble opinion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilia Liz</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-690</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a theologian, so my opinion may not be worth much, but I personally take it to mean &quot;satisfaction&quot; in a sexual way, not in terms of satisfying one&#039;s physical hunger for food.  If you read the Song of Solomon, you will see a lot of sexual imagery, including that describing a woman&#039;s breasts, and it doesn&#039;t seem to refer to breastfeeding.  But again, everyone interprets the Scriptures in their own way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a theologian, so my opinion may not be worth much, but I personally take it to mean &#8220;satisfaction&#8221; in a sexual way, not in terms of satisfying one&#8217;s physical hunger for food.  If you read the Song of Solomon, you will see a lot of sexual imagery, including that describing a woman&#8217;s breasts, and it doesn&#8217;t seem to refer to breastfeeding.  But again, everyone interprets the Scriptures in their own way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicsunlimited.com/2007/08/06/breastfeeding-in-the-bible/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>I at first took it that way too and all the commentaries I&#039;ve read have that view. It is after all about marital fidelity but I thought the verse could be read either passively or actively so I checked the Hebrew out and the word satisfy it seems doesn&#039;t mean grateful but drink until full???
What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I at first took it that way too and all the commentaries I&#8217;ve read have that view. It is after all about marital fidelity but I thought the verse could be read either passively or actively so I checked the Hebrew out and the word satisfy it seems doesn&#8217;t mean grateful but drink until full???<br />
What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

