Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category



27
Sep

Still Here!

No, the site has not been abandoned.
Earlier this year I sustained a considerable injury that left me unable to go to work for about a month (roughly when you saw a surge in posts!). Now back at work, I lost quite a bit of muscle and gained quite a bit more of the undesirable stuff on the belly. Hence, the time that was allotted to blog-writing is currently redirected towards rehab/training. To bridge the gap, I may post some links to other writers as well as a trickle of original material. This is temporary – writing will be back in full swing when the rest of me is.

Things I’m looking at right now

Bad Toronto/GTA Cops
Here
and Here
and Here
Wouldn’t it be cheaper to hire the local skinheads to patrol the streets? Surely there have to be better candidates for policing than this. Maybe it’s time to talk about salary hikes …

Can Belinda get anything right?
Seemingly not. All of her achievements seem to be directly related to the thievery/destruction of someone else’s creation. I have a nice story about Belinda and a speech I saw her give recently…

Hand-wringing over the Gardiner
Who cares? There are far better things to spend $ on … like sending the thug cops to get the homeless out of the downtown core.

07
Aug

Reuters Drops the Ball

Merely days after CU expressed reservations about the accuracy media coverage in the Middle East, a new controversy has erupted:

Reuters, the global news and information agency, told a freelance Lebanese photographer on Sunday it would not use any more of his pictures after he doctored an image of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on Beirut.
The photograph by Adnan Hajj, which was published on news websites on Saturday, showed thick black smoke rising above buildings in the Lebanese capital after an Israeli air raid in the war with the Shiite Islamic group Hezbollah, now in its fourth week.
“The photographer has denied deliberately attempting to manipulate the image, saying that he was trying to remove dust marks and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under,” said Moira Whittle, the head of public relations for Reuters.

Granted Ms Whittle has a job to do, but she really needs to learn the difference between removing dust marks and cloning. The former involves the removal of “specks” on a digital photographs, and cannot possibly result in the disparity of colors shown below. By contrast, cloning involves copying a portion of a photograph to another part of the photograph. When done well the picture looks seamless and unaltered. Poor cloning results in an apparent texture pattern, which is clearly visible in the smoke patterns of this photo.

beirut-original.jpg

A possible original photograph (Source: LGF)

beirut-pshopped.jpg

Beirut Photograph, as Published by Reuters

Reuters has lost any media source’s most important asset – credibility. Already, pundits are questioning the validity of Reuters’ Qana photographs and no doubt other photographs from Hajj are under scrutiny.

The original charge of photo manipulation was made by Charles Johnson of the popular Pro-Israeli blog Little Green Footballs. For his effort, Johnson was threatened via email and the email was IP traced to none other than Reuters. Current speculation is that Inayat Bunglawala, Media Secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain, may have been involved in creating the threat. Meanwhile, more charges of doctored and staged photos are being levied by the hour.

The discovery of the doctored photos and forced admission of error by Reuters represents a huge victory for the blogosphere; by forcing a large media conglomerate to admit error and correct its ways, the independent online media has established itself as a semi-reliable check and balance on news disseminated by the mainstream media.

The loser in this skirmish is obvious. Hajj is clearly the instigator of the controversy, but clearly the blame belongs with the editing staff at Reuters. With a topic as divisive and high-stakes as the conflict in the Middle East, the news agency should be going over every piece of information it receives with a fine-toothed comb. Reuters could easily argue that LGF and other blogs attacking this story are partisan and no more interested in accuracy than Hajj, and they might be right; however, Reuters is supposed to differentiate itself from blogs (for which there is no minimum bar of journalistic integrity) with original, accurate and verified content. By not adhering to such standards, Reuters gives the public no reason to trust their reports any more than those of any idealist with a Blogspot account.

Also, Reuters, fire your PR department. That was a terrible excuse.

31
Jul

On Conservatism and Freedom

JeffG of Common Sense (Ain’t So Common Anymore) has written a good piece on conservatism and imposing one’s will on others.

People who call themselves Social Conservatives often try and use the coercive power of the state to impose morality upon their fellow citizens. This has manifested itself in many forms over history: The Inquisition, Puritans in England, the “Religious Right” to name just a few.
…
There are many ways to emphasise (sic) the different aspects of what it is to be a Conservative, and this post is my attempt to define my opinion on the subject. I would never seek to impose my opinions on others. We conservatives are not a monolithic group, which has gotten us in trouble in the past, with some “wingnuts” being blown out of proportion by the media.

I don’t have a blogger account so I’ll add my $0.02 here …

A question came up about morality and how it applies to left-wing and right-wing politics. Technically, morality is a doctrine or system of conduct, meaning virtually everyone has “morals”. Hence politics –a subjective discipline- is moral at its core and no branch of political thought is 100% free from wanting to impose some form of morality.

With that in mind, the morality of various conservative and progressive groups can be differentiated in terms of adherence to freedom:

  • Progressives and moderates from the 1960’s and earlier (many of whom are center-right conservatives today) tended to support positive freedom – the freedom to control one’s own destiny.
  • Present-day leftists/progressives tend to support negative freedom – the freedom from obstacles and impediments
  • The religious right does not support any specific freedoms but rather clamps down on certain freedoms to ensure a moral order compatible with spiritual teachings. (this definition applies to all religions, not just Christianity)

Positive freedom represents a threat to the controlling group benefiting from the inequity. Women’s suffrage and the original Civil Rights movement were about empowering disadvantaged groups via enabling political participation and synchronizing legal rights with those afforded to white males.

Negative freedom can represent a threat to both the controlling group and, occasionally, the underlying systems created in accordance with positive freedom. For example, affirmative action is based on the moral decision that people from all backgrounds should be free from hiring discrimination, measurable by proportional representation in public and private sector employment. This morality is enforced with the establishment of hiring quotas, which can ignore free market realities (eg group X is underrepresented in education pertaining to the job; there are few job openings in the field) or at worst promote unqualified people from the “right” minority group.

Religious morality is a threat to anyone who doesn’t happen to share the same religious convictions. In the case of abortion, religious fundamentalists and other social conservatives already have the freedom to not partake and to speak out against the practice. However, the religious right attempts to force everyone to become de facto Christians by legally banning the practice for all citizens.

With that in mind, I’ve observed that political groups are only accused of “forcing morality” on others when that morality infringes on the positive freedoms of a large group. When people complain about the “left”, they usually refer to policies that subvert the idea of a free market; complaints against the “right” are often against social conservatives who try to limit the positive freedoms of any lifestyle contrary to their own (e.g. homosexuals and marriage).

To that effect, social conservatives could be called “conservatives” in that they are attempting to preserve the social order of days gone by; however their methods and some of the principles SoCons uphold run counter to the ideas of individuality and freedom often identified with the conservative movement.

29
Jul

Antisemitic Crimes – Put up or Shut up Time

The latest outbreak of war in the Middle East has finally resulted in an unprovoked hate crime against Jewish citizens:

Authorities said a man walked into the Jewish agency on Friday and opened fire, killing one woman and injuring at least five others in what they call a hate crime. Naveed Afzal Haq, 30, was booked into the King County Jail for investigation of homicide and attempted homicide, police said.
The gunman, who employees said claimed to be a Muslim angry at Israel, forced his way through the center’s security door after an employee had punched in her security code, said Marla Meislin-Dietrich, a co-worker who was not at the building at the time.

While the US killings can be attributed to radical Islamacists, the stateside pro-war brigade, whose hawkish tendencies in order support their own geopolitical and theological goals surpass that of even Israelis, must share some blame for these types of attacks. In column after blog after interview, pundits recklessly advocate death against “Muslims” (which inevitably encompasses a large number of people from non-Muslim middle easterners to unrelated cults), presumably in the name of Israel and the Jewish people, without any regard for repercussions. There have also been suggestions for the government to restrict the movement and freedoms of all stateside Muslims, and some citizens aren’t waiting for the law to catch up with their whims – a colleague of mine reported that here in Toronto a man was recently kicked off the TTC for yelling “I will not stand next to this terrorist!!” at a rider who entered the bus wearing a hijab.

This story didn’t make the paper, but you can bet that woman shared the story with her friends and colleagues. Guess what happens when regular citizens of a group are under siege? Local extremists, sensing the righteous indignation among moderate Muslims, take their revenge on Jews – all Jews. Like stateside Zionists and Diaspora waging the war on terror from the safety of their ergonomic keyboards, local Islamic radicals fail to recognize that Jews and Israel aren’t synonymous –

  • A portion of Orthodox Jews do not agree with Israel in its present form, arguing that Israel can only be given to the Jewish people directly from God. The very human attempt to maintain the state is dismissed as “playing God”
  • There are many secular and Jews who disagree with Israel’s policies and alleged human rights abuses. Frequently cited by detractors include the suppression of Palestinian civilians, illegal torture of prisoners and the state’s facilitation of South Africa’s apartheid government. This is not to say these Jews oppose the central concept of Zionism, but rather that they are dissatisfied with the sometimes brutal manner in which it has been implemented
  • … And of course there are many Jews who don’t have any strong feelings in favor of or against Israel, but remain faithful to Judaism and attend the same synagogues being attacked

As a Sephardic friend once told me, put 100 Jewish people in a room and you will hear 100 opinions on what Israel’s doing right and wrong. A look at the week’s editorials at the Jerusalem post confirms this diversity in opinion, which is all but drowned out in the uniform war cry of stateside Neo-Cons, Evangelicals and post-9/11 Crusaders for Israel’s unmitigated bombing of its neighbors. It’s very easy to declare war with someone else’s army (and economy), just as it is easy to go Christmas shopping with someone else’s credit card.

I’d like to know whether these same people are willing to help protect my family members, friends and work colleagues whose recent history and warrior class are being used in the front lines of this war. You may feel justified in supporting Israel’s front-line military action because you want to avoid another 9/11 or because you believe this is the last stage in your inheritance of the holy land, but would you be willing show real support for the Jewish people by patrolling a synagogue or donate money to facilitate such protection? Please consider it.

There is a higher purpose for this post and I’ll get to that later.

22
Jul

Maintenance

This blog will be going through some changes as the layout is updated. Please bear with me. In the meantime, check out the following blogs -

Jack’s Newswatch: Good news aggregator. Also good Middle East information … from a consevative point of view
Dr Dawg’s Blawg: Good analysis on the Isreal incursion into Lebanon … from a progressive point of view
Psyhopolitik: Libertarian blog on American and International politics

17
Jul

Measured Malice or Disproportionate Libel?

A furor is growing over seven Canadians killed in Lebanon by Israeli airstrikes:

OTTAWA (Reuters) – Seven Canadians from the same Montreal family, including four young children, were killed in Lebanon on Sunday when Israeli aircraft bombed a house in the south of the country, the Canadian Broadcasting Corp said.

A Canadian foreign ministry spokeswoman confirmed the deaths and said three people were hurt. But she said the incident happened when the house in the town of Aitaroun was shelled.

Canadian Foreign Minister Peter MacKay said Ottawa was sending ships to help evacuate up to 40,000 Canadians believed to be in Lebanon.

The CBC named the dead as Ali El-Akhras, his wife Amira and their four children aged one, four, six and eight. The seventh family member was Ali’s uncle, also named Ali, who had moved to Montreal from Lebanon 15 years ago.

At Small Dead Animals, I got into a semi-heated discussion with Kate’s staunchly pro-Israeli readership about the relatively muted conservative response to the death of Lebanese civilians. The exchange was relatively civil – not at all like the venom being spewed at the Globe and Mail. Please take a minute to read some of the comments on the G&M discussion board. Israeli expansionism will never gain favour on this blog, and I do believe that using airstrikes on suburban areas is extremely dubious; however some of the accusations being levelled at Israel and PM Stephen Harper are simply unfair. Time to address two of them:

Accusation #1: Stephen Harper supports or is indifferent to the death of Lebanese-Canadians
Some Canadians have implied that Stephen Harper’s statement “I think Israel’s response under the circumstances has been measured.” is an endorsement of civilian attacks. However this story was reported on the 14th, two days before any known Canadian casualties. Posters are attacking Harper as valuing Israeli lives over Canadian lives before he’s had the chance to react … but not before Canada pledged to send boats to help evacuate Canadians remaining in Lebanon. The < 24 hour turnaround represents a faster response to imperiled Canadians than the previous government ever offered. Harper has not made any statement since this story broke so it is premature for commenters like Jim Roth to assume his indifference.

Accusation #2: Israel intentionally targets civilians
Right or wrong, IAF airstrikes were targeting Hezbollah infrastructure rather than civilians. The Jerusalem Post has reported that the only homes directly targeted were those of senior Hezbollah officials. Other civilian deaths have been accidental (eg Israeli gunboats misfiring at relay stations for al-Manar television – a Hizbullah propaganda channel). The IDF often drops leaflets warning citizens to evacuate an area before striking a Hezbollah target, which has keep the number of civilian casualties relatively low. Concerning for the dead Canadians, Israel has formally apologized to Ottawa and is conducting an investigation. A similar investigation is being conducted for the killing of Lebanese soldiers, who are also not official IDF targets. And let’s face it – if Israel intentionally attacked civilians then far more than 140 would be dead by now.

My sincere condolences to the family members of those lost in this unfortunate attack. May the memory of the dead not be clouded by the half-truths of ulterior political motives.

12
Jul

Headbutt ‘em all with Zidane

Zinedine Zidane’s headbutt to Marco Materazzi was perhaps a fitting end to a generally ugly world cup tournament. Speculation is still raging about exactly what Materazzi could have done or said to provoke such a nasty response (which ultimately may have cost France the world cup, since Zidane received a red card for his efforts and thus was unable to participate in the final penalty shootout).

There is little sense passing judgement on Zidane or Materazzi before the truth is known. In the meantime, I found this mean-spirited little Flash game created by an Italian fan. Now you can BE Zidane x 10 and whack all the Materazzis you want. This game is far from the most sophisticated in its class of poor taste parodies, but it’s timely and will at least waste a few minutes of your time. Naturally this is classic Italian sportsmanship on display but that’s another story. Click on the picture below to begin ….

ZidaneGame.jpg

Update: Here’s an even better cartoonized game -

ZidaneGame2.jpg

01
Jul

Happy Canada Day!

flag.jpg

It’s number 139 for the Great White North – day to celebrate the nation and … do something other than work. So before I go to my scheduled event and tie a few on, here is a list of CU’s top 10 great things about Canada.

10) Landscape
Rocky mountains, Artic tundra, marshland, the Canadian Shield … few nations have a greater variety in climates and landscapes.

9) Healthcare System
The bottom line for Canada’s healthcare system is simple: general sickness will not break your bank. We will argue for eternity what other procedures should and shouldn’t be included under provincial healthcare plans, but when someone falls ill, his/her first concern is rarely whether (s)he can “afford” to live.

8) International Reputation
.. Well at least no one hates Canada. Even prior to Canada’s career as a peacekeeping nation (which seems to be coming to an end), the nation has been on the humanitarian side of most wars. Immigration legislation from John Diefenbaker and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrined Canada as a nation committed to justice and opportunity for all people.

7) You can have your Point of View
… Without fear of being killed or persecuted. Even Canada’s hate crime laws still allow for a large range of views that may be found offensive to some. Furthermore, people with largely opposite views typically fight their battles in newspapers and TV debates. The only “slaughters” tend to be of the intellectual variety.

6) Voters have a Choice
In Canada, a liberal is a liberal, rather than being lumped together with the left in a conspiratorial manner. The true left wing votes NDP, which does a sufficient job of being beholden to unions and social causes. The Conservative Party of Canada is a standard center-right party, while previous parties like the Reform Party of Canada tended to the needs of social conservatives. In other words, Canadian votes needn’t necessarily be funneled into large and contradictory tents. Recent history has shown that it is possible to start a new party based on an idea and achieve moderate success.

5) Cultural Diversity
Long before Trudeau’s multicultural policy, Canada consisted of distinct peoples. Since the English-French complex, waves of immigrants have come from the Ukraine, India, China and Italy among other places. While nearly all migrants eventually assimilate into the fabric of Canada, the traditions they bring with them nonetheless alter that fabric to encompass the best that the entire world has to offer. Cultural diversity can also be seen geographically – the rites and traditions in Newfoundland differ profoundly from those in Ontario or Alberta. Variety is the spice of life.

4) Religious Freedom
Christians, Hindus, Muslims and others are free to follow their strict moral codes without fear of persecution or widespread discrimination. Complaints from religious zealots in Canada amount to bemoaning the fact that they are unable to force the entire nation to follow their moral codes or the imagined moral codes of days gone by. This attitude runs counter to the idea of religious freedom, which inherently includes freedom from religion.

3) Wide open spaces
Very overlooked – Canada has plenty of room to roam outside the urban landscapes. This allows a lot of room for future expansion and for the general appreciation of nature – one of Canada’s greatest resources.

2) High Standard of Living
What is considered “impoverished” in Canada is middle class or better in most of the world. Only a few areas of the nation have housing markets so hot that the average family cannot afford to buy a single detached home. Apart from the aforementioned health care, education is free or can be obtained via national and provincial loan systems that have reasonable repayment terms. Police are relatively uncorrupt. Even the UN has consistently placed Canada in the top 10 nations.

1) People Can Make it in Canada
No matter where you come from, you have the opportunity to make at least a sustainable living for yourself in Canada. The nation’s legal code satisfies the conservative principle of personal prosperity being possible, while social services and the general attitude of the nation make personal prosperity probable. Having been “knocked down” a few times myself, I’ve always admired how there were always other options in terms of job training and education. Bottom line – if you want to be successful, there IS a way to do it. The ride may not always be smooth, but the landing is typically safe.

With the amount of partisan bitching that goes on in the mainstream and independent media, it is nice to consider the positive aspects of our nation once in awhile.

02
Apr

Toronto’s Vile Customer Service

Toronto may never be renowned for it customer service, but some employees are determined to raise the bar in terms of sheer ignorance.

Two guests and myself went to a restaurant for a meal we had enjoyed many times in similar restaurants. The waitress, forgoing the inconvenience of a greeting, proceeded directly to take our orders. After the two ladies ordered she turned around to me and hastily shot out “and you?”. A minor faux pas, and so the order went in.

45 minutes passed, and this waitress managed to utter not a single word to us. This stood in stark contrast to her treatment of the other primarily-Hindi tables, where “please”, “thank-you” and smiles could be found in abundance. As always, we ordered too much food and asked for the food to be wrapped up. A guttural snarl was the best the waitress could afford us (again contrasting with the hospitality shown to some of the other tables). Finally I’d had enough and asked for the check. The waitress came out with 2 – one which was placed on the table with a kind “thank you” and one that was dumped on our table with a heavily muted “thanks” and no eye contact. Splendidly enough, the waitress’ worst act of rudeness occurred just before it was time to determine her tip, and the tip … let’s just say it involved a lot of English and a single-digit numeric value.

There’s little sense in speculating about the waitress’ motivation for such outlandish behavior. A more poignant question is why so many people have experienced similar treatment in an increasingly service-oriented economy.
From retail stores to telephone banking, the complaints remain consistent:

  • Service is rude or condescending
  • Workers are abrupt and try to dismiss you as soon as possible
  • Employees allow the quality of their service to be influenced by personal prejudices and/or workplace politics
  • Completely unknowledgeable and/or disinterested employees

Anyone who’s been shopping in New York knows that customer service in Toronto is generally boorish and hostile. One wonders what it will take before Toronto consumers as a whole demand better from its restaurants and boutiques. Perhaps these stores should be maligned in cyberspace as badly as Earthlink or AOL?

07
Mar

Meme Tagged

Yes, this is one of those viral-type ploys where you post some worthless personal information and try to coax other bloggers into doing the same… My lack of interest in writing anything important today is the main motivation for participating…

Four jobs I’ve had:

Software Developer
Quality Assurance
Camp Counselor
Power Washer

Four movies I can watch over and over:

Gangster #1
Full Metal Jacket
Metropolis (anime)
Clockwork Orange

Four places I’ve lived:

Toronto
London
Waterloo
Montreal

Four TV shows I love:

The Sopranos
Law & Order: SVU
CSI
Monster (anime)

Four highly regarded* and recommended TV shows I haven’t seen (much of):

Lost
Band of Brothers
Rome
This season of American Idol

Four places I’ve vacationed:

Niagara Falls
Trinidad
Montreal
Cottage Country

Four of my favorite dishes:

Lasagne
Sushi
Roti
Fajitas

Four sites I visit daily:

The Toronto Star
Google News
Andrew Coyne
iBegin

Four places I’d rather be right now:

Trinidad
Spain
Japan
Any nice and sunny resort, holding a martini

Four new bloggers I’m tagging:

With Good Reason
iBegin Blog
The Mike Haddad Show
Jack’s News Watch




Further Research

Twitter

Archives

Categories